From: Kannan Goundan (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2010 - 02:25:27 CDT
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 23:30, Asmus Freytag <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Why not use SCSU?
> You get the small size and the encoder/decoder aren't that
Hmm... I had skimmed the SCSU document a few days ago. At the time it
seemed a bit more complicated than I wanted. What's nice about UTF-8
and UTF-16-like encodings is that the space usage is predictable.
But maybe I'll take a closer look. If a simple SCSU encoder can do
better than more "standard" encodings 99% of the time, then maybe it's
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2010 - 02:28:14 CDT