Re: Hexadecimal digits

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2010 - 07:52:54 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Emoji (was: Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode)"

Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: Luke-Jr: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Otto Stolz <Otto dot Stolz at uni dash konstanz dot de> wrote:

> I do not know, how successful Nystroms proposal has been,

The Wikipedia page says, "This first hexadecimal system, proposed in the
19th century, had no success at all."

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Emoji (was: Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode)"
Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Next in thread: Luke-Jr: "Re: Hexadecimal digits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 04 2010 - 07:55:51 CDT