Re: Unihan is back, but...

From: Robert Abel (
Date: Tue Aug 03 2010 - 13:00:22 CDT

  • Next message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Unihan is back, but..."

    On 2010/08/03 18:17, John H. Jenkins wrote:
    > Thanks for the report; it's been fixed.
    > BTW, problems with the Unihan database should be reported via
    > They're less likely to slip
    > through the cracks that way.
    Speaking of slipping through cracks. Are there any plans to update the
    reference glyphs for all Han characters added after approximately
    Unicode 3.1? I filed an error report on said page some time ago and got
    back that Unicode just didn't get around to producing them. So is there
    an estimate on when that will be the case?


    Original reply to my report:
    > Roger,
    > Thank you for the error report. It appears that we have no reference glyphs for any characters added after (approximately) Unicode 3.1 because we haven't yet been able to produce them.
    > Regards

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 03 2010 - 13:04:03 CDT