From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 17:20:55 CDT
Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at telia dot com> wrote:
> I see absolutely no point in reencoding the digits 0-9 even though
> 9 is (strangely) used to denote the value that is usually denoted 10.
> That is just a (very strange) usage, not different characters from
> the ordinary 0-9.
I suggested encoding all of them because U+0030 through U+0039 have the
Nd nature. Remember, this is just for the ConScript registry, not for
"real" Unicode, so it's more of an exercise than anything.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 04 2010 - 17:23:42 CDT