Re: CSUR Tonal

From: Kent Karlsson (
Date: Wed Aug 04 2010 - 18:02:56 CDT

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Re: A Standard fallback characters (was: Draft Proposal to add VariationÚ Sequences for Latin and Cyrillic letters)"

    Den 2010-08-05 00.20, skrev "Doug Ewell" <>:

    > Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at telia dot com> wrote:
    >> I see absolutely no point in reencoding the digits 0-9 even though
    >> 9 is (strangely) used to denote the value that is usually denoted 10.
    >> That is just a (very strange) usage, not different characters from
    >> the ordinary 0-9.
    > I suggested encoding all of them because U+0030 through U+0039 have the
    > Nd nature.

    That does not prevent anyone from using them for (ordinary) hexadecimal,
    octal, etc.

    > Remember, this is just for the ConScript registry, not for
    > "real" Unicode, so it's more of an exercise than anything.

    I know.

        /kent k

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 04 2010 - 18:05:24 CDT