From: sowmya satyanarayana (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Dec 14 2010 - 02:12:30 CST
Thanks to everyone for valuable suggestion.
From: Asmus Freytag <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Markus Scherer <email@example.com>
Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <firstname.lastname@example.org>; email@example.com;
Kenneth Whistler <firstname.lastname@example.org>; email@example.com;
Sent: Fri, 3 December, 2010 2:49:26 AM
Subject: Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro
On 12/1/2010 12:34 PM, Markus Scherer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
>-On [20101129 07:09], Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
>>>Searching the web, you can find that this request resulted in a
>>>Technical Report, but as I wrote before, I don't know who
>>>these recommendations, and if so, where and when.
C1x (n1516) has 6.4.5 which contains the following string literal
>> u8, u, U, L
>>So at least any compiler going to claim c1x conformity will have to
>>it. A long time in coming, but it's there for the feature list.
C++0x has these too.
I've created a summary of this topic here:
http://unicode.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=88&start=0ocus on the new data types and literals.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 14 2010 - 07:48:35 CST