Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro

From: sowmya satyanarayana (
Date: Tue Dec 14 2010 - 02:12:30 CST

  • Next message: Christopher Fynn: "Playing cards...."

    Thanks to everyone for valuable suggestion. ~ Sowmya ________________________________ From: Asmus Freytag <> To: Markus Scherer <> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <>;; Kenneth Whistler <>;; Sent: Fri, 3 December, 2010 2:49:26 AM Subject: Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro On 12/1/2010 12:34 PM, Markus Scherer wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <> wrote: > >-On [20101129 07:09], Asmus Freytag ( wrote: >>>Searching the web, you can find that this request resulted in a >>>Technical Report, but as I wrote before, I don't know who >>>implemented >>>these recommendations, and if so, where and when. >> >> C1x (n1516) has 6.4.5 which contains the following string literal prefixes: >> >> u8, u, U, L >> >>So at least any compiler going to claim c1x conformity will have to >>support >>it. A long time in coming, but it's there for the feature list. >> C++0x has these too. See markus I've created a summary of this topic here: on the new data types and literals. A./

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 14 2010 - 07:48:35 CST