From: sowmya satyanarayana (sowmya_satyanarayana@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Dec 14 2010 - 02:12:30 CST
Thanks to everyone for valuable suggestion.
~ Sowmya
________________________________
From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
To: Markus Scherer <markus.icu@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@in-nomine.org>; martin@v.loewis.de;
Kenneth Whistler <kenw@sybase.com>; sowmya_satyanarayana@yahoo.com;
unicode@unicode.org
Sent: Fri, 3 December, 2010 2:49:26 AM
Subject: Re: UNICODE version of _T(x) macro
On 12/1/2010 12:34 PM, Markus Scherer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
<asmodai@in-nomine.org> wrote:
>
>-On [20101129 07:09], Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>>>Searching the web, you can find that this request resulted in a
>>>Technical Report, but as I wrote before, I don't know who
>>>implemented
>>>these recommendations, and if so, where and when.
>>
>>
C1x (n1516) has 6.4.5 which contains the following string literal
prefixes:
>>
>> u8, u, U, L
>>
>>So at least any compiler going to claim c1x conformity will have to
>>support
>>it. A long time in coming, but it's there for the feature list.
>>
C++0x has these too.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#New_string_literals
markus
I've created a summary of this topic here:
http://unicode.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=88&start=0ocus on the new data types and literals.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 14 2010 - 07:48:35 CST