From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Dec 21 2010 - 19:32:40 CST
While not personally a fan of this system, I don't see why this wouldn't
be appropriate for CSUR.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luke-Jr" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 13:06 Subject: CSUR Proposal: Tonal: U+E9D0 - U+E9EF > After months now of usage, and a (small) community beginning adoption, > I am > making the first formal proposal of the Tonal glyphs for the ConScript > Unicode > Registry. Please note that while digits 0 through 8 share the decimal > equivalents, I decided to leave 'ko' (deci. 10, looks similar to '9') > glyph as > its own character, since the decimal 9 may be rendered using a > straight line > looping at the topic, while the Tonal 'ko' must always be rendered as > a > flipped 'by' (6). For compatibility purposes, software may still > choose to > interpret a '9' in a Tonal number as 'ko'. > > Proposed this an-th (1th) day of Anuary (1), in the year of Our Lord > rasan, > laton, hu (7): > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/glyphs/CSUR.html > > Some fonts (including Luxi Sans and Console) with the proposed glyphs > added: > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/glyphs/fonts/ > > Draft keyboard map for a Tonal user: > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/keyboard/dvorak-tonal.png > > Educational materials (primarily for young children, NOT someone > familiar with > decimal) using this proposed encoding can be found in the tree at: > http://luke.dashjr.org/education/tonal/ > > Comments and constructive criticism welcomed. > > Thanks, > > Luke
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 21 2010 - 19:35:12 CST