Re: UTF-c

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Sun Feb 20 2011 - 10:17:13 CST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [unicode] UTF-c"

Previous message: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp: "Re: [unicode] UTF-c"
In reply to: Thomas Cropley: "UTF-c"
Next in thread: Christoph P�per: "Re: UTF-c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thomas Cropley wrote:

> I have developed a new multi-byte character encoding for Unicode. It
> is similar to UTF-8 but it is more efficient at encoding non-ASCII
> alphabetic scripts. The attached UTF-c.htm file gives more details and
> the C++ program “UTF8_c.cpp” shows how UTF-c files may be processed.

So far I don't see any significant advantages over SCSU.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [unicode] UTF-c"
Previous message: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp: "Re: [unicode] UTF-c"
In reply to: Thomas Cropley: "UTF-c"
Next in thread: Christoph P�per: "Re: UTF-c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 20 2011 - 10:21:53 CST