From: Asmus Freytag (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Apr 06 2011 - 18:00:31 CDT
On 4/6/2011 3:24 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag
>> Beyond the overzealous unification with Tarot, I'm not sure the unification across
>> local variations of the cards holds up to scrutiny. I would want to see working
>> implementations that correctly show the local variations without fail, before
>> believing in this aspect of the unification.
> Can we please start by asking for any existing evidence of these being used _as characters_?
I've been asking the same thing:
> Before using the existing set as a precedent for adding additional
> characters, it would make a lot of sense to sit back and find out what
> the actual user experience has been with these already encoded
> characters. Now that they exist, it should be possible to search for
> evidence of actual (and non-contrived) usage of these characters in
> plain text.
So, let's hear for citations of these (and other game symbols) in actual
plain text (or at least used as characters).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 06 2011 - 18:01:59 CDT