RE: Three modest proposals

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Apr 06 2011 - 17:24:25 CDT

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Proposal for Combining Up Tack Above"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Three modest proposals"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Three modest proposals"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Three modest proposals"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Three modest proposals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Asmus Freytag

> Beyond the overzealous unification with Tarot, I'm not sure the unification across
> local variations of the cards holds up to scrutiny. I would want to see working
> implementations that correctly show the local variations without fail, before
> believing in this aspect of the unification.

Can we please start by asking for any existing evidence of these being used _as characters_?

Peter

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Proposal for Combining Up Tack Above"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Three modest proposals"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Three modest proposals"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Three modest proposals"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Three modest proposals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 06 2011 - 17:25:28 CDT