From: fantasai (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue May 17 2011 - 14:47:33 CDT
On 05/17/2011 01:26 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 17 May 2011, at 02:34, fantasai wrote:
>> I will let you and Michael Everson argue over that then, because Ogham is
>> not my area of expertise. It seems to me that you, however, might want to
>> file an issue against Unicode 6 chapter 14.1, which states "Ogham should
>> therefore be rendered on computers from left to right or from bottom to
>> top (never starting from top to bottom)." which implies a preferred
>> bottom-to-top directionality.
> It does not imply that. The preferred rendering on computers is from left
> to right. If someone is going to render any Ogham text vertically, however,
> then it should not be done top-to-bottom.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. It implies a preferred bottom-to-top
directionality *when rendered as vertical text*.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 17 2011 - 14:50:13 CDT