ALM (was: Re: RTL PUA?)

From: Ken Whistler <>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:09:12 -0700

On 8/21/2011 3:31 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> I expect ARABIC LANGUAGE MARK would not go down well
> - has it already been proposed and rejected?.

ARABIC *LETTER* MARK, not *LANGUAGE* mark. (And suggested
to just be renamed to "AL MARK".)

Proposed? Yes.

Discussed? Yes.

Rejected? No.

The last UTC meeting took a consensus to issue a public review
issue on the proposed ALM and ELM (embedding level mark)
characters. So there will be further discussion and chance for input.

Nothing has been decided yet.

Received on Mon Aug 22 2011 - 16:12:22 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 22 2011 - 16:12:23 CDT