Den 2011-09-10 02:32, skrev "Stephan Stiller" <sstiller_at_stanford.edu>:
> Actually, I *was* talking about purely typographic/aesthetic ligatures as
> well. I'm aware that which di-/trigraphs need to be considered from a font
> design perspective is language-dependent. But the point is that I observe
> that:
> (a) aesthetic ligatures are not frequently seen in modern German print and
I would assume that is because many commonly used fonts are designed in such
a way that letter glyphs don't overlap anyway. And then you should not use
any ligature. (Sorry if my original "should" implied otherwise.)
/Kent K
Received on Fri Sep 09 2011 - 19:47:40 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 09 2011 - 19:47:41 CDT