Re: Armenian Eternity Sign (proposal)

From: Mark E. Shoulson <mark_at_kli.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:27:48 -0500

On 01/19/2012 01:07 PM, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Claims that the Unicode-assigned name of a character, script, or block
> is biased or racist or prejudiced against a certain group never get
> very far with me, I'm afraid.
But wouldn't it be nice to head one off *before* the name is
unchangeable, for a change?

~mark
Received on Thu Jan 19 2012 - 13:31:32 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Matt Ma: "UCA tertiary weight assignment vs. decomposition type definition in Unicode character database"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: Armenian Eternity Sign (proposal)"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "RE: Armenian Eternity Sign (proposal)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "RE: Armenian Eternity Sign (proposal)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 19 2012 - 13:31:33 CST