On 27/02/2012, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai_at_in-nomine.org> wrote:
> -On [20120226 21:11], Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzmeyer_at_nic.fr) wrote:
>>Note that it is a direct violation of RFC 5892. U+1F4A9, being of
>>category So, should be DISALLOWED. The registry was wrong to accept
>>it.
>
> Oh, this will be fun. So I guess they did not check the codepoint categories
> in their validation step then? (I honestly have no idea how NICs do this
> nowadays, it's been ages since I messed with stuff on that level.)
Now isn't everyone going to want their logo encoded so they can have
a domain like this? ~ The pressure to do so could be enormous.
Received on Mon Feb 27 2012 - 15:47:27 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 27 2012 - 15:47:28 CST