Re: Emoji domains

From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:55:11 +0100

-On [20120226 21:11], Stephane Bortzmeyer ( wrote:
>Note that it is a direct violation of RFC 5892. U+1F4A9, being of
>category So, should be DISALLOWED. The registry was wrong to accept

Oh, this will be fun. So I guess they did not check the codepoint categories
in their validation step then? (I honestly have no idea how NICs do this
nowadays, it's been ages since I messed with stuff on that level.)

Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン | GPG: 2EAC625B
Is this all there is of me..?
Received on Sun Feb 26 2012 - 14:58:54 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Feb 26 2012 - 14:58:56 CST