On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 19:09, Michael Everson wrote:
>No, because both the combining-a and the combining-diaeresis are bound to the base letter; the combining diaeresis is not bound to the combining-a.
Just like the proposed U+1ABB COMBINING PARENTHESIS ABOVE will be bound to the base letter, not the combining mark that it's parenthesizing. Oops.
—Ben Scarborough
Received on Mon Mar 05 2012 - 14:19:34 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 05 2012 - 14:19:34 CST