Le 5 mars 2012 21:17, Benjamin M Scarborough
<benjamin.scarborough_at_utdallas.edu> a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 19:09, Michael Everson wrote:
>>No, because both the combining-a and the combining-diaeresis are bound to the base letter; the combining diaeresis is not bound to the combining-a.
>
> Just like the proposed U+1ABB COMBINING PARENTHESIS ABOVE will be bound to the base letter, not the combining mark that it's parenthesizing. Oops.
Well seen ! There's a bug somewhere in the encoding model.
Why wouldn't the proposed COMBINING PARENTHESIS ABOVE be simply
represented as the COMBINING ENCLOSING PARENTHESIS, and then the
custom vertical stacks encoded using the control format or diacritic I
just proposed ?
Received on Mon Mar 05 2012 - 14:25:44 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 05 2012 - 14:25:45 CST