On 3/5/2012 2:01 PM, Denis Jacquerye wrote:
> Wouldn't CGJ be useful in some way in cases like that of the cedilla
> or the light centralization stroke 1AB9 ?
> "Base character + combining letter + CGJ + combining cedilla" would be
> clear, the cedilla would not be moved.
How is that simpler than "Base character + combining-c-cedilla" ?
--which is what the
users want.
Trying to introduce recursion of decomposition into these kinds of combining
marks just creates a mess, IMO.
> 1DEC is not based on a character that itself is decomposable, at least
> the way things are, so it's not on topic.
>
Actually, c-cedilla *is* decomposable, which is precisely why it *is* on
topic.
See U+00E7, which has a canonical decomposition mapping.
--Ken
Received on Mon Mar 05 2012 - 16:22:22 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 05 2012 - 16:22:23 CST