Re: Latin chi and stretched x

From: Jean-François Colson <jf_at_colson.eu>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:31:36 +0200

Le 08/06/12 10:13, Michael Everson a écrit :
> On 8 Jun 2012, at 01:52, Jean-François Colson wrote:
>
>> 15 rotation characters have already been proposed for signwriting:
>> http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n4090.pdf
>> Look at page 4. If those characters could be applied to Latin
>> letters, we’d have:
>> ʁ = ʀ + SWR13
>> ᴙ = ʀ + SWR9
>> ᴚ = ʀ + SWR5
>> ᴝ = u + SWR3
>> ᴟ = m + SWR7
>>
>> That would be very practical.
> This would absolutely be the wrong thing to do.
Why?
Received on Fri Jun 08 2012 - 06:34:33 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 08 2012 - 06:34:35 CDT