On 2012/07/11 11:04, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> Ever start to feel that we would have been better off not to give
> official descriptive names at all? Or else really vague ones like
> "LETTERLIKE THINGY NUMBER 5412"? So much blood-pressure raised over the
> names...
I'm feeling that way since about the mid-1990ies, since I discovered
that for CJK Ideograms, there is a cop-out of
"CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH 4E00" and so on. It's also the only place where
numerals are allowed in character names.
Regards, Martin.
Received on Tue Jul 10 2012 - 22:11:22 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 10 2012 - 22:11:22 CDT