Re: (Informational only: UTF-8 BOM and the real life)

From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:09:49 -0700

On 7/25/2012 2:45 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> . One might even argue that the BOM is useful here, too, since it
> immediately signals that there is something wrong, and “ï»¿” is an
> encoding error signature, so to say.
>

A./
Received on Wed Jul 25 2012 - 17:13:55 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Wordingham: "CLDR and ICU"
Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: (Informational only: UTF-8 BOM and the real life)"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: (Informational only: UTF-8 BOM and the real life)"
Next in thread: Leif H Silli: "Re: (Informational only: UTF-8 BOM and the real life)"
Reply: Leif H Silli: "Re: (Informational only: UTF-8 BOM and the real life)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 25 2012 - 17:14:12 CDT