Re: (Informational only: UTF-8 BOM and the real life)

Asmus Freytag on 26/7/'12, 1:10
> On 7/25/2012 2:45 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> . One might even argue that the BOM is useful here, too, since it
>> immediately signals that there is something wrong, and “” is an
>> encoding error signature, so to say.
>
> +8

I agree. But the real issue here is that e-mail application's inability to send a decent plain text version of the HTML message. In fact, I don't think there are many email apps that are good at that. (But Thunderbird used to be good.)

--
Leif H Silli