No, I was contrasting the behaviour of s followed by U+0332, for which
there is no precomposed letter, with U+1E95, which is the precomposed
equivalent of z followed by U+0332.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Prilop <prilop4321_at_trashmail.net>wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Bill Poser wrote:
>
> > Characters with a combining low line encoded as a single Unicode
> > codepoint are rendered correctly. Thus 's' followed by U+0332
> > is rendered as 's' followed by a low line, but U+1E95
> > LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH LINE BELOW is correctly rendered
> > with the underscore beneath the 'z'.
>
> You seem to confuse U+0331 and U+0332.
> There is no precomposed letter with U+0332.
> There are several precomposed letters with U+0331, see
> http://www.user.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/combining-marks.html
>
> --
> Outgoing mail is certified free from defamation of Islam™
> and insult of the Prophet™.
> Checked by Thinkpol anti-obscenity system v. 6.66.
>
>
Received on Tue Oct 09 2012 - 12:35:06 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 09 2012 - 12:35:12 CDT