RE: latin1 decoder implementation

From: Phillips, Addison <>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:32:56 -0800

The block is actually named for it. See:

This FAQ talks about it:

Finally, p217 of the standard actually says so explicitly:


Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

From: [] On Behalf Of Buck Golemon
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 2:12 PM
To: Doug Ewell
Cc: unicode
Subject: Re: latin1 decoder implementation

That's my personal understanding as well, but can you help me find documentation that I can show to my skeptical workmates?

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Doug Ewell <<>> wrote:
Code points U+0000 through U+00FF in Unicode are identical to the corresponding code points 0x00 through 0xFF in ISO 8859-1.

Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | @DougEwell ­

Received on Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:34:27 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:34:27 CST