Actually, what Buck really needs is Section 16.1 Control Codes:
http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.2.0/ch16.pdf
That explains the situation for the *non* graphic characters in the range U+0000..U+00FF, which is the source of the concern for Buck's skeptical workmates, I'm sure.
--Ken
> You can quote the Unicode Standard, Version 6.2 itself:
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.2.0/ch07.pdf
>
> On page 215 (Section 7.1, "Latin"):
> "Unicode follows ISO/IEC 8859-1 in the layout of Latin letters up to
> U+00FF."
Received on Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:35:58 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 16 2012 - 16:35:58 CST