Re: s-j combination in Unicode?

From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:30:53 -0800

On 2/13/2013 1:24 PM, Stephan Stiller wrote:
>
>> It looks like something that has not been encoded.
>
> What is the reason for not having a true "combining grapheme joiner",
> one that overlays graphemes? Or a code point that instructs that the
> preceding (or following, I guess) code point should be printed at this
> position but otherwise be treated as having zero width?
>

The reason is that Unicode is not a text layout language.

A./
Received on Wed Feb 13 2013 - 16:32:01 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 13 2013 - 16:32:01 CST