On 2/16/2013 7:04 AM, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> [BTW Is the fact that o-slash is not decomposed not entirely
> analogous to the fact that i is not decomposed? I would say
> that neither gives an indication of how symbols involving
> a combining dot or combining slash are handled in general.]
Why don't you just take the precedent as what it is and make your
proposal accordingly. Some decisions that went into Unicode could have
come out different perhaps, but history says the didn't, and we are
stuck with them. Changing horses in mid-stream helps nobody.
A./
Received on Sat Feb 16 2013 - 12:08:33 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 16 2013 - 12:08:40 CST