On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:36:16 +0100
Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com> wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2013, at 13:41, Denis Jacquerye <moyogo_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > If we don't want additional confusing characters maybe we should
> > have CGJ, ZWJ or ZWNJ + combining cedilla (or any other similar
> > sequence) to optionally differentiate the types of cedillas in
> > Latvian, Livonian, Marshallese and romanizations.
>
> We can't really use these with combining diacritical marks.
It does remind me of the distinction between German umlaut marks and
diaereses, for which CGJ was the solution. There's a similar problem
with the distinction in dictionaries between Nenets U+0438 CYRILLIC
SMALL LETTER I plus combining breve to shorten it and the Nenets use of
the semivowel U+0439 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHORT I.
Richard.
Received on Wed Jun 19 2013 - 12:40:28 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 19 2013 - 12:40:29 CDT