Good question, Jean-François.
I seem to recall that typographers may make a distinction between
"black-letter" and "fraktur" forms, but even if they, the differences
are typographical, not essential. For the purpose of *character*
encoding, one would need to make a very strong rationale for disunifying
these.
This rationale is absent in document WG2 N3907 that requests these
characters.
Therefore, it seems these two additions should not have been made.
A./
On 9/10/2013 2:23 AM, Jean-François Colson wrote:
> Version 7 of Unicode includes the following two letters:
> ꬲ AB32 LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER E
> ꬽ AB3D LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER O
>
> There already were the following two:
> 𝔢 1D522 MATHEMATICAL FRAKTUR SMALL E
> 𝔬 1D52C MATHEMATICAL FRAKTUR SMALL O
>
> For these, there’s an annotation:
> @ Fraktur symbols
> @+ This style is sometimes known as black-letter.
>
> What’s the difference between U+AB32 and U+1D522?
> Between U+AB3D and 1D52C?
>
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 10 2013 - 12:05:01 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 10 2013 - 12:05:04 CDT