2013-09-10 20:01, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> This rationale is absent in document WG2 N3907 that requests these
> characters.
If this is document
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/SC2/wg2/docs/n3907.pdf
then I’m rather confused: it proposes AB51 for LATIN SMALL LETTER
BLACKLETTER O and does not include LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER E at
all. And as far as I can see, the proposal has not been accepted.
> Therefore, it seems these two additions should not have been made.
When and how have the additions been made?
> On 9/10/2013 2:23 AM, Jean-François Colson wrote:
>> Version 7 of Unicode includes the following two letters:
>> ꬲ AB32 LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER E
>> ꬽ AB3D LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER O
As far as I can see, the current version of Unicode is 6.2, and code
points AB32 and AB3D are unassigned (reserved). There are no characters
with BLACKLETTER in their Unicode name.
Yucca
Received on Tue Sep 10 2013 - 12:39:07 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 10 2013 - 12:39:07 CDT