From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:24 -0700

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:43:24 -0700

On 9/11/2013 1:13 PM, Michael Everson wrote:

*>>> Nonsense. And blackletter isn't identical to Fraktur.
*

*>> >It is not different enough to base a character encoding distinction on it. Why don't we code "times" and "garamond" shapes then as characters as well.
*

*> "The Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block contains a large extension of letterlike symbols used in Mathematical notation, typically for variables. The characters in this block are intended for use only in mathematical or technical notation, and not in nontechnical text."
*

*>
*

*> When these were encoded, we put them in the SMP to help naïve users to avoid using them for text. You know. For words and names and paragraphs. Text.
*

Yes, the intent of technical was to identify usage where using STYLED

TEXT was inappropriate, not to single out science or engineering.

*>
*

*> I do not believe that "mathematical or technical notation" includes phonetic transcription, because phonetic transcription is an orthography expressing words.
*

No, it's a notation to express phonetics, a technical aspect within the

field of linguistics.

*> You can argue that it is "technical", but that was not the intent behind the encoding of the Mathematical characters, and I won't buy the argument that it was.
*

I'm glad to. MN was the reason to encode them, indeed, but to construct

that in the limiting sense you do reads something into this that wasn't

there - simply that nobody knew that there was use of these in phonetics.

*>
*

*>>> >>The proper thing to do is to use the new letters for the linguistic functions for which they were encoded, and to leave the math letters alone for the mathematicians and their complicated fonts.
*

*>> >This will inevitably end up with mathematical and linguistic documents mis-coded, because people will select a shape from a drop down, and not the character code (like you - being a character code maven - might do).
*

*> Germanicist linguists will not go to the Mathematical Alphabets for their characters if their characters are encoded in the same block as the rest of the Teuthonista characters.
*

*>
*

*> Mathematicians will use the software interfaces provided for them, and will never see the Teuthonista characters.
*

Let's hope for that, although I simply don't believe this.

*> The Teuthonista characters were correctly encoded, and correctly disunified from the mathematical alphabets.
*

I disagree and am beginning to regret that I can't be part of the WG2

work any longer otherwise I would have noticed those in time.

*> Enough doom and gloom from you!
*

Hah!

OK here's a bit of sugar to make the medicine go down: :) :) :)

Received on Wed Sep 11 2013 - 15:45:18 CDT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0
: Wed Sep 11 2013 - 15:45:18 CDT
*