Re: full-width Latin missing from confusables data

From: Mark Davis ☕ <mark_at_macchiato.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:53:17 +0200

> but as Michel mentioned the data
does not seem consistent in that case.

You might add that to your report​...

Mark <https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033>
*
*
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
**

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Chris Weber <chris_at_lookout.net> wrote:

> On 10/14/2013 12:40 AM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
> > For the confusables, the presumption is that implementations have
> > already either normalized the input to NFKC or have rejected input that
> > is not NFKC.
>
> Thanks for the explanation Mark. It makes sense for implementations
> which want to detect confusability, but as Michel mentioned the data
> does not seem consistent in that case. Another case could be
> implementations which want to generate confusable strings for testing -
> do you think those could be improved by having this extra data? For
> example:
>
> http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/confusables.jsp?a=m&r=None
>
> > It would probably be worth clarifying this in the text of
> > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Identifier_Characters. There is an
> > upcoming UTC meeting at the start of Nov., so if you want to suggest
> > that or any other improvements, you should use the
> > http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html.
>
> Thank you, I'll file a report.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Chris Weber - chris@lookout.net - http://www.lookout.net
> PGP: F18B 2F5D ED81 B30C 58F8 3E49 3D21 FD57 F04B BCF7
>
Received on Tue Oct 15 2013 - 13:55:38 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 15 2013 - 13:55:38 CDT