Re: Unclear text in the UBA (UAX#9) of Unicode 6.3

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz_at_gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:08:56 +0300

> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:32:15 -0700
> From: Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse_at_ilyaz.org>
> Cc: verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr, ken_at_unicode.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz_at_gnu.org>,
> unicode Unicode Discussion <unicode_at_unicode.org>, James Clark
> <jjc_at_jclark.com>
>
> Sorry, I do not see any definition here. Just a collection of words
> which looks like a definition, but only locally…

Any definition is just a collection of words, of course. Can you tell
what is missing from this collection to make it eligible?

> 1( 2[ 3( 4] 5) 6)
>
> Is looking-at-1 forcing match of 3-and-5? Or what?

No.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Tue Apr 22 2014 - 11:10:00 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 22 2014 - 11:10:00 CDT