On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 01:29:05 +0000
Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Similarly, there is nothing in TUS itself to specify whether /kuː/
> (Lao /kʰuː/) 'pair' is spelt <U+1A23 TAI THAM LETTER LOW KA, U+1A6A
> TAI THAM VOWEL SIGN UU, 1A76 TAI THAM SIGN TONE-2> or <U+1A23, U+1A76,
> U+1A6A>. Unlike Thai, these two sequences are not canonically
> equivalent.
Correction: Read U+1A75 TAI THAM SIGN TONE-1 for U+1A76 in both
locations.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Sun Jan 04 2015 - 14:50:17 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 04 2015 - 14:50:18 CST