Re: Arrow dingbats

From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:16:31 -0700

Manuel Strehl <boldewyn at gmail dot com> wrote:

> Interesting! Out of curiosity: How come this was recognized in Unicode
> 7?
> Is that documented anywhere?

NamesList.txt contains this entry for the left arrow:

2B05 LEFTWARDS BLACK ARROW
        x (black rightwards arrow - 27A1)
        x (rightwards black arrow - 2B95)

I don't know how U+2B95 came to be encoded in 7.0 when all of the
similar U+2B0x arrows had been in place since 4.0. Presumably, before
then, it was felt that U+27A1 was an appropriate fit, though as Chris
idou747 pointed out, not all fonts show perfect symmetry here.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
Received on Thu May 28 2015 - 11:17:29 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 28 2015 - 11:17:29 CDT