Sorry to be a pain. I mentioned I looked up the minutes and couldn't find
anything apropos.
Could someone explain the rational behind 134-C2 and how it might apply to
the rainbow flag proposal ?
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 at 20:04 Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:
> More:
>
> >> [...] the UTC does not wish to entertain further proposals for
> >> encoding of symbol characters for flags, whether national, state,
> >> regional, international, or otherwise. References to UTC Minutes:
> >> [134-C2], January 28, 2013.
>
> This is also why U+1F3C1 CHEQUERED FLAG doesn't set a precedent for
> encoding additional flags as single characters: it was also introduced
> in Unicode 6.0, more than two years earlier.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
>
>
Received on Sun Jun 28 2015 - 14:53:03 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 28 2015 - 14:53:03 CDT