Re: Another attempt at plain language

From: Doug Ewell <>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:06:24 -0700

Mark Davis 🍾 wrote:

> However, if it ends up not being added as a BCP47 variant, one could
> file a ticket for consideration as a BCP47 locale variant. The syntax
> would be a bit different, eg en-u-va-plain vs en-plain.

To clarify, this would be an extension-U subtag in accordance with RFC

I'm confused how "plain English" (or German or what have you) represents
any sort of aspect of a locale. Is "special variant" that open-ended?

Doug Ewell | | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
Received on Fri Sep 04 2015 - 10:08:37 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 04 2015 - 10:08:38 CDT