Re: Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters

From: Daniel Bünzli <>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:59:49 +0100

Le mardi, 29 septembre 2015 à 21:03, Richard Wordingham a écrit :
> Too wordy and clearly prone to error!

Yes and maybe that "average engineer" does not understand negation. So clearly any of non-ASCII, non-Basic Latin or greater than U+007F cannot fit. Bring in the bureaucrats, new terminology is needed, there are not enough useless definitions in the Unicode standard, let's add a few more.

Received on Tue Sep 29 2015 - 16:00:56 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 29 2015 - 16:00:57 CDT