Re: Acquiring DIS 10646

From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 12:00:12 -0600

Sean Leonard wrote:

> What I understand is that Draft 1 got shot down because it was at
> variance with the nascent Unicode effort;

If I remember correctly, Draft 1 looked a lot like an updated and
expanded version of ISO 2022, much more than it did like today's
Unicode/10646.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
Received on Sat Oct 03 2015 - 13:01:23 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 03 2015 - 13:01:23 CDT