Re: Acquiring DIS 10646

From: Janusz S. Bien <>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 20:24:29 +0200

Quote/Cytat - Doug Ewell <> (Sat 03 Oct 2015 08:00:12

> Sean Leonard wrote:
>> What I understand is that Draft 1 got shot down because it was at
>> variance with the nascent Unicode effort;
> If I remember correctly, Draft 1 looked a lot like an updated and
> expanded version of ISO 2022, much more than it did like today's
> Unicode/10646.

Rob Pike, Ken Thompson
Hello World

The draft of ISO 10646 was not very attractive to us. It defined a
sparse set of 32-bit characters, which would be hard to implement and
have punitive storage requirements. Also, the draft attempted to
mollify national interests by allocating 16-bit subspaces to national
committees to partition individually. The suggested mode of use was to
‘‘flip’’ between separate national standards to implement the
international standard.



Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bień -  Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra  
Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bień - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department),,
Received on Sat Oct 03 2015 - 13:25:29 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 03 2015 - 13:25:29 CDT