RE: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block

From: Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 07:47:01 -0700

I wrote:

> Pandey's proposal suggests they
> should have General Category AL, like other Syriac letters.

AL is a bidi type, not a General Category. Still.

http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#AL

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸

Received on Wed May 11 2016 - 09:47:21 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "RE: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Wheelock: "RE: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 11 2016 - 09:47:21 CDT