Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?

From: Julian Bradfield <jcb+unicode_at_inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:52:54 +0100 (BST)

On 2016-10-10, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Not relevant! Here were'e not speaking about punctuation between words, but
> inclusion within words in phonetic trancrtiptions where even word
> separation is not always relevant and punctuation us almost absent.
> There's no case in Spanish with "¡" in the middle of a word. But here we're
> speaking about noting a consonant within words where vowels can also be
> expected in phonetic transcriptions. And there the confusion with a
> following voiwel i is very likely. On the opposite, IPA symbols are
> carefully chosen to avoid visual confusions (and that's why they only exist
> in a single lettercase).

<i> and <¡> are less confusable than <l> and <ɪ>,
especially in a sanserif font. In both cases, the main visual cue is
a descender/ascender in one letter than isn't in the other.

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Mon Oct 10 2016 - 15:53:22 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 10 2016 - 15:53:22 CDT