RE: The (Klingon) Empire Strikes Back

From: Shawn Steele <>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:44:13 +0000

I'm a little confused. I thought that the primary reason Cirth and Tengwar were on the roadmap - and not actually encoded - were because of the IP concerns? (I confess to not following them very closely, so I may be wrong.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Unicode [] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 9:40 AM
To: Unicode Mailing List <>
Cc: Mark Shoulson <>; Peter Constable <>
Subject: RE: The (Klingon) Empire Strikes Back

Peter Constable wrote:

> Klingon _should not_ be encoded so long as there are open IP issues.
> For that reason, I think it would be premature to place it in the
> roadmap.

But Mark's point about removing it from the "Not the Roadmap" page, which categorizes it among "Scripts (or pseudoscripts) which have been investigated and rejected as unsuitable for encoding," may be a valid one. There is a difference between "unsuitable for encoding" and "might turn out to be unencodable due to IP issues."

Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US |
Received on Tue Nov 15 2016 - 11:44:31 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2016 - 11:44:31 CST