Re: "Oh that's what you meant!: reducing emoji misunderstanding"

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper_at_crissov.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 07:27:55 +0100

Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org>:
>
> Or, people could just say what they mean, using language.

That’s not how language (or communication in general) works. At all.
Received on Fri Nov 18 2016 - 00:29:23 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: James Kass: "Re: "Oh that's what you meant!: reducing emoji misunderstanding""
Previous message: James Kass: "Re: "Oh that's what you meant!: reducing emoji misunderstanding""
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: "Oh that's what you meant!: reducing emoji misunderstanding""
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: "Oh that's what you meant!: reducing emoji misunderstanding""
Reply: James Kass: "Re: "Oh that's what you meant!: reducing emoji misunderstanding""

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Nov 18 2016 - 00:29:23 CST