Invisible letter (was Re: a character for an unknown character)

From: David Corbett <>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:56:27 -0500

Couldn’t you use U+1D52 MODIFIER LETTER SMALL O?

(I changed the subject line because the invisible letter proposal is not
relevant to the question about a lacuna character.)

> I strongly support this. In our historical corpus of Polish
> we have in particular words ending with 'COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER
> O' (U+0366).
> We had to precede the character with NBSP as the vase, but to preserve
> the correct segmentation into words we had to treat NBSP as a letter.
Received on Wed Dec 21 2016 - 10:57:12 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Dec 21 2016 - 10:57:12 CST