Couldn’t you use U+1D52 MODIFIER LETTER SMALL O?
(I changed the subject line because the invisible letter proposal is not
relevant to the question about a lacuna character.)
> I strongly support this. In our historical corpus of Polish
>
> http://korpusy.klf.uw.edu.pl/en/IMPACT_GT_2/
>
> we have in particular words ending with 'COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER
> O' (U+0366).
>
> We had to precede the character with NBSP as the vase, but to preserve
> the correct segmentation into words we had to treat NBSP as a letter.
Received on Wed Dec 21 2016 - 10:57:12 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Dec 21 2016 - 10:57:12 CST