Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

From: Asmus Freytag <>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 08:59:42 -0700

On 3/26/2017 8:47 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:45, Asmus Freytag <> wrote:
>> The latter is patent nonsense, because ä and aͤ are even less related to each other than "i" and "j"; never mind the fact that their forms are both based on the letter "a". Encoding and font choice should be seen as separate.
> He refers to the shape of the diacritical marks.

I see the issue: the font selected on my end made the "e" look like an
"o", which completely changed my understanding of what he tried to

> Michael Everson
Received on Sun Mar 26 2017 - 10:59:55 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Mar 26 2017 - 10:59:55 CDT