Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

From: Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:20:42 +0100

> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:59, Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/2017 8:47 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>>> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:45, Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The latter is patent nonsense, because ä and aͤ are even less related to each other than "i" and "j"; never mind the fact that their forms are both based on the letter "a". Encoding and font choice should be seen as separate.
>> He refers to the shape of the diacritical marks.
>
> I see the issue: the font selected on my end made the "e" look like an "o", which completely changed my understanding of what he tried to communicate.

Ah, yes.

M
Received on Sun Mar 26 2017 - 11:22:05 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Mar 26 2017 - 11:22:05 CDT