Re: Eszett variation sequence

From: MacCampus <maccampus_at_t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:04:31 +0200

Actually, the Berlin street signs are well-known cases of using the alternate form of the German sharp s. I personally have never seen a straight y in German usage anywhere else. For me, both cases can sufficiently being taken care of using OpenType features or simply a dedicated font, as is the case with the lettering in Berlin.

The German Wikipedia article on the „ß“ (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%c3%9f) names the author of the font (Herbert Thannhäuser); in the English version on the letter, this information is missing. The article dedicated to Herbert Thannhäuser personally (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Thannhaeuser; German Wikipedia only) makes it clear that the font used in Berlin was especially commissioned from him, so it was probably more a one-off design.

Am 06.04.2017 um 15:26 schrieb Michael Everson <everson_at_evertype.com>:

>
> http://evertype.com/standards/unicode-list/seydlitzstr.jpg
>
> Do you think we should encode a Latin straight y (like the Cyrillic one) so we can write Seүdlitzstraſʒe?
>
>>
>> Would it make sense to propose standardized variation sequences for these styles or should this be left to font features like `cv##` or `calt` in Opentype?
>

++++++++++++++++
Sebastian Kempgen
MacCampus®
Germany
Received on Thu Apr 06 2017 - 12:55:00 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 06 2017 - 12:55:00 CDT