Re: CSUR and UCSUR glyphs

From: Doug Ewell via Unicode <>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 09:31:04 -0700

Michael Bear wrote:

> Some of the glyphs were no problem, such as the Tengwar and Cirth
> ones, because their pages actually show the glyphs on their pages.
> Others do not, which poses a bit of a problem. [...]

As you probably read on both the CSUR and UCSUR sites, neither is
sponsored or endorsed by Unicode. They are side projects embarked upon
by individuals, some of whom also happen to be involved in the
Consortium. Please keep this in mind.

I was never able to find some of these scripts, such as Pikto, even in
the '90s when CSUR activity was at its peak. Herman Miller's site,
linked from CSUR, still has all or most of his early alphabets.

Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US |
Received on Tue May 09 2017 - 11:31:55 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 09 2017 - 11:31:55 CDT